The Dark Secrets of High Society | Episode 162

The Dark Secrets of High Society | Episode 162

SUPPORT THE VOICES FOR VOICES® TV SHOW AND PODCAST
https://www.voicesforvoices.org/shop/p/supporter

Chapter Markers
0:00 Deportation of Sex Offenders Debate
19:19 Medical Field Power and Abuse

Why do 158 members of the U.S. House, all Democrats, stand against a resolution to deport migrants convicted of sex offenses? Get ready for an eye-opening exploration into the realm of political accountability, where we scrutinize the controversial stance of these elected officials. We dissect the impact of their decision, emphasizing the broader consequences of crime on victims, families, and communities. This episode challenges the status quo by highlighting the need for consistent legal consequences, regardless of citizenship status. Our conversation is enriched by a global perspective, featuring an illustrative situation involving MP Nadia Whittome in London, adding depth to our understanding of how power and accountability are handled worldwide.

Shifting gears, we confront unsettling realities within the medical field, spotlighting the harrowing case of Dr. Stephen Leedy, a physician charged with creating child sexual abuse material and exploiting minors. This chilling narrative underscores the catastrophic misuse of authority and the dire need for justice and accountability across all sectors of power, including doctors and political figures. Through the tragic consequences faced by his victims, including a minor's suicide, we shine a light on the demand for heightened ethical standards for those in influential roles. Tune in as we continue to amplify the voices of victims and foster a community determined to hold power to account.

Recent actions taken by U.S. lawmakers regarding the deportation of migrants for sex offenses have raised important questions about accountability and the disconnect between political decisions and their implications on society’s vulnerable populations. This episode addresses the complex interplay between legislation, moral responsibility, and the need for vigilant public engagement.

• Highlighted the significance of knowing elected representatives' actions
• Discussed the effects of crime on communities and families
• Examined international instances of political inaction regarding sex offenders
• Analyzed the implications of the U.K. parliament’s controversial decisions
• Addressed systemic issues of political correctness overshadowing justice
• Covered the case of a Florida doctor exploiting minors and its tragic outcomes
• Stressed the necessity for ongoing dialogue about accountability in leadership
• Emphasized the importance of acting in solidarity for vulnerable communities

Voices for Voices® is the #1 ranked podcast where people turn to for expert mental health, recovery and career advancement intelligence.
—
Thanks for listening!

Support Voices for Voices®: https://venmo.com/u/voicesforvoices
Learn more about Voices for Voices®: linktr.ee/Voicesforvoices

#housecommitteeonthejudiciary #endoftheworld #whitehousepressbriefing #customsandborderprotection #theworldtonight #sexoffenses #sexoffenders #stephenleedy #courttv #politicaltheoryproject #london #customsandborderpatrol #politicalhistory #deportationmoratorium# #deportations #icedirectorhoman #freedomofexpression #thewall #capitolhill #partisan(political) #partisan #politicalparties #partisanpolitics #republicanparty(politicalparty) #partisanpolarization #democraticparty(politicalparty) #political #partisandivide #networkforresponsiblepublicpolicy #unitedstatespolitics #partisanship #artificialintelli

Chapters

• 0:00 Deportation of Sex Offenders Debate
• 19:19 Medical Field Power and Abuse

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:00

Welcome to this episode of the Voices for Voices TV show and podcast. I am host and founder and executive director of Voices for Voices, justin Allen Hayes. Welcome to this episode. This is a part two of the two-part series where in the first episode the first part we talked through and we read names of 158 members of the United States House of Representatives who voted against a House resolution of deporting of migrants for sex offenses. So we did. We took about eight minutes or so, which is a lot of time, a lot of air time, a lot of time that could have been spent on other subcontent, but it's important In this case.

Speaker 1: 1:12

Names are important. We should know, as the average US citizen, we should know and hold people accountable, especially our elected officials, who are being paid by you and I, the United States American taxpayer, for salaries and benefits. Privacy security is funded by you and I, and so when we have topics where they're just incredible to talk about, we want to bring those up and we're going to have added additional episodes. Uh, as we work our way through 2025 and and beyond, where we need to get this content out sooner than our regular production schedule. The beauty of being in the studio there's too many areas. That makes being in the studio beautiful and being able to do the filming there of the majority of our episodes. But, with that being said, sometimes there's limitations where we're on a production schedule, where we're filming ahead, and so at this point in time, we're quite a ways ahead, but we don't want to hold back this content and sharing it with you because it's important.

Speaker 1: 3:17

As an organization, we get to decide that If it's not important to you, maybe tune off this episode. We don't like to have people turn away, but we want to have the people, the viewers, the listeners that have been with us from the beginning, that have been with us from the beginning or have just recently, in the last episode or two, found out about Voices for Voices and found our valuable Voices for Voices TV show and podcast. So, wherever you fall on that, we want to make sure that what we're doing as an organization, where we're doing things ethically, we're holding people accountable, we're obviously sharing the voices, and we're sharing the voices of individuals who have been taken advantage of, and so, again, those 158 United States House of Representatives which happened to all the Democrats that voted against deporting migrants for sex offenses, you know and the individuals who have been impacted family, friends, coworkers. There's so many people get impacted by these things, and not just sex offenses, but breaking the law in general. It touches much more than just the victim. You know the victim, family and the friends, the coworkers, and even the perpetrator or accused alleged. You know, before you know they go through the judicial process, the criminal justice process process, the criminal justice process, and so, as a father, I feel this is very important to share, as an individual who wouldn't want my representative voting against this, whether the individual was convicted of a sex offense that was a US citizen or not, I don't care whether you're a US citizen or not. You break the law, you do the crime. You do the time, full stop. That's where we're at on this. This particular House resolution is talking about migrants, people coming from outside the United States, and that's what was specifically voted on.

Speaker 1: 6:25

As a human being, I think if I go to a different country and that's what we should just think about Just think about it If we were to go, you and I, we were to go to a foreign country, hypothetically we would commit a crime. Would you expect to be let go and just go home, just like forget about it. I wouldn't, and I think my judgment would be flawed if I thought that, oh yeah, I could go to a foreign country, break their law and I won't be deported back to my home country. The laws don't apply to me, come on, you know they say come on man. Well, come on. Any human being, any human being it takes a second to think about that hypothetical would be expected to say yeah, yeah, you know what? I probably wouldn't be let go. You know if I, you know, we're not going to name other countries because we have a great following in over 500 cities, over 50 countries, and it's growing by the day. So I'm not going to individualize a particular country. Now, if I start talking about different facts and the facts come from trusted sources from a particular country, now that's something different. But if I'm just hypothetically throwing again a hypothetical out there, I'm not gonna do that, because that's just to me, it's not the best way to go through a situation like this. So I just said I want to talk about countries and hypotheticals, and that's true. But when you have facts, that's different. And so what we're going to be touching on is really an extension of what we talked about last episode In the United States.

Speaker 1: 9:11

We talk about the voting of a particular House resolution that 158 US House representative members voted against, and nope, we shouldn't deport individuals for sex crimes. Nope, we don't. We shouldn't deport individuals for sex crimes. So more research and more research come across multiple sources that are reporting the same thing. So not just going with one source and saying, yeah, this is what we think. So at least five sources came out with this exact post printout and these are legit. And we talk about what's legit. Well, if there is stationery with a particular country or city on there, a seal, you know, on documents, signatures, those are things where we think of holding a little bit more water than just a type message on a social media platform, a type message on a social media platform. So in London, this information is coming from the office of Nadia Otome, mp, which is a member of parliament, and Nadia is a member of parliament for Nonnyman East. Nadia is a member of parliament for Nonnyman East House of Commons in London, sw1a 0AA, and she posted a list of MP members of parliament who voted against deporting foreign rapists.

Speaker 1: 11:27

Hmm, where else did we hear something similar to this? Could it have been part one of this two part series? I think so. So that's where the 158 comes into play with what we're talking about here. And so here's a list of the members of parliament in London who voted against deporting foreign rapists. So they're a little bit more specific in talking about. You know, we talk about sex crimes and so I'm kind of blocking out. And so there's some names there and there's some names there, just not going to take the time that we took in the previous episode to read the names. People who are elected on this specific topic voted like this.

Speaker 1: 12:53

What do they have against children? What do they have against people in general who have been victimized by sex crimes, by rape, specifically in London, where they have their centralized government there? What do they have against those people? These people are people and human. Again, what's going on here? The United States had a resolution 158 elected officials said thanks, thanks, but no thanks. We shouldn't deport them. It's not bad enough. These crimes are just not bad enough. We shouldn't even deport them if the crime is that bad. And who are we to say if the crime is bad or not? Anybody, again, who has a child, a daughter, a son. And again, these actions don't just affect children and that's the sickest, the most vile individuals take part in crimes against children, but sex crimes still happen to adults, and adults can be, country to country, 18 and over, 21 and over.

Speaker 1: 15:15

We're not here to talk about that verbiage and go deep diving into that. We're here talking about the specific. You know, in the United States we talk about Sweden, poor migrants who've been convicted and have committed sex crimes, yes or no. And then we have here, most recently that I just shared, the members of parliament in London who voted against deporting foreign rapists. Why is there even a list of people that voted against? That's probably the most alarming piece. Why is there even a list of people who voted against that? And if we put that aside, why are there three columns of MPs or members of parliament? Why are there three columns of names? It just blows blows my mind and it probably blows your mind as well.

Speaker 1: 16:44

Another piece coming, coming out of probably blows your mind as well, another piece coming out of that part of the world. It's called we're talking here Mario no Fall, the article we pulled, but the article is across many, many sources, so we're just going to give credit where credit is due. It says a disturbing pattern emerges from Farage's revelations Labor suppresses inquiries while conservatives dodge responsibility. For 14 years, the Tories had power to investigate rape gangs targeting children. They didn't. Now Starmer, who was director of public prosecutions during the crisis, blocks the statutory inquiry. Sorry, no, can't inquire about that.

Speaker 1: 17:49

This isn't incompetence, it's institutional cowardice. When political correctness trumps overrules protecting children, the system isn't just broken, it's corrupt, and that's really what we're talking about here. We're talking about corruption. So, while authorities sanitize terminology, grooming gangs instead of rape gangs predators operate with impunity across 50 British cities. So staying with this theme. So the establishment's message is clear They'd rather bury truth than face it, and I think, again, that's just sickening. So let's go back across the pond here to the United States, and this is one of many, many cases that have kind of tangentially crossed over, as we're talking about sex crimes, and so we're talking here in Florida, the state of Florida, there's a doctor that was charged for exploiting minors online.

Speaker 1: 19:19

Well, okay, so a doctor? What's a doctor? Besides, what specifically they do as a doctor their day to day, whether they do surgeries or they're able to prescribe medication, assess somebody has a disease, a challenge if they need medication. Disease, the challenge if they need medication. There's somebody in power in a power position. Now we just got done talking in the part one of this two-part series of 158. Okay, well, those 158 are in places of power. It's not the law, isn't for we, it's for the, the being, you and I, so members in power.

Speaker 1: 20:23

So a doctor is an individual who is considered in power, right, you go to the doctor, I go to the doctor. We want to see a professional, somebody who has education, experience with certain areas, whether it's mental health, whether it's chiropractor, whatever that thing is. We want to go to the people that are the professionals, the specialists that have that specialty training. When the car's not working, take it to a mechanic. If I need legal advice, I talk to an attorney, those types of things.

Speaker 1: 21:12

So a doctor? So this doctor is a 59-year-old doctor from St Petersburg, and so we're going to give name because the name is publicized here Stephen Leidy. He now faces charges for creating child sexual abuse material in color St Miners online, and so authorities are saying that Leidy was using. You know, so we talk about children and minors. Okay, so Leidy was using, you know, so we talk about children and minors. Okay, so Leidy is a doctor, so he's in a power position and his username, which also would put somebody in a Power position Maximum uncle 9-1-1-2. So an uncle, a mom, a dad, and you know, and we talk about the hierarchy of the family In the power position so in my family I'm in a power position as a dad, so I'm a dad to my daughter and my wife's a mom to her daughter, and so this judge, this judge got my mind thinking about the criminal justice process.

Speaker 1: 22:34

A particular doctor exploited at least 10 minors, making them create self-content, explicit content and self-harm, and where this all kind of comes to a head is in 2021, a minor died by suicide. And how is this related? It's reported that the individual, the minor that died by suicide, did so following this Dr Leidy's instructions. So in this case, this individual, he's looking at life in prison if he's found guilty on all charges, and so this is coming out of the US Attorney's Office, the Middle District of Florida. So this is very unfortunate, but this is what we should be doing with these individuals, these migrants, whether they're from a different country than the United States, but they're here and they haven't gone through the process to become a US citizen, and even if they have, you do the crime, you do the time, and so this particular doctor, if it comes to light that he did the crime, he should most definitely do the time.

Speaker 1: 24:22

That's what we're talking about here, and we're going to actually have a three-part series, because we do have some additional content, because WE DO HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL CONTENT TO REALLY CLOSE OUT THESE PARTICULAR AREAS, these TOPICS. Started WITH 158 AND THEN WE GOT THE THREE COLUMNS I DIDN'T GO TH add up how many members of parliament there were that voted against deporting foreign rapists and then again we brought it back here to the United States and we closed on a story coming out of Florida where there was a doctor that was using the position of power taking advantage of minors and one died by suicide, reportedly by their instructions, and so as an organization, voices for Voices we believe that the actions were allegedly perpetrated by this individual, this doctor. You should definitely go through the criminal justice process If the time comes, where I'm not going to speculate on what we think, that what was described, with the 10 minors and one reportedly dying by suicide, according to his instructions. I'm just not going to comment on what we think ultimately should happen sentence-wise, but definitely needs to pay and due to the time, and we'll just leave that there.

Speaker 1: 27:09

So again we thought, and I thought we were going to have a two-part series here and I was wrong, but it's good. It's good that we're sharing information. You may be unaware that we're sharing information, you may be unaware of some of this information, and so we're sharing it. We don't have to like every single thing that we talk about and we select guest-wise or content-wise, but what you're going to be able to do, and what you've been able to do since the first episode, is you're going to and have been hearing and seeing the voices of people, of stories of people, experiences of people, the voice in all of us, of people, experiences of people, the voice in all of us.

Speaker 1: 28:08

So, whether I'm that voice, whether in this particular story, where the 10 minors, those are the voices I'm speaking from documents that talk about these 10 minors, and so we don't have the names of those 10, but I'm being the mouthpiece of those 10 to say, yeah, this happens, and it's not just one socioeconomic class. We have people in elected positions who are deciding to say nope, nope, this isn't bad, this is not bad enough. We have a doctor in a power position and stay tuned for episode three, where we're going to talk about additional people in power positions and the credibility that we have given over the course of time, for whatever reason we'll find out. Come back for episode three of this three part series. So this is episode two. Come back for episode three. Thank you again for joining us on this episode of the Voices for Voices TV show and podcast. I am your host, founder and executive director of Voices for Voices, justin Allen Hayes. Until next time, be a voice for you or somebody in the world.